NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 16
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1536MB VRAM Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition and 16GB VRAM GRID RTX T10 16 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 16 's Advantages
Boost Clock1395MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1536GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (604.8GB/s vs 76.80GB/s)
3392 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition
0.462 TFLOPS
GRID RTX T10 16
+2064%
9.999 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2008
Release Date
Unknown
Quadro FX
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1065 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1395 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1575 MHz
Memory
1536MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
384bit
76.80GB/s
Bandwidth
604.8GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
24
SM Count
56
192
Shading Units
3584
64
TMUs
224
24
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
448
-
RT Cores
56
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
192 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
14.45 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
89.28 GPixel/s
38.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
312.5 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
20.00 TFLOPS
462.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
9.999 TFLOPS
57.79 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
312.5 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
150W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GT200B
GPU Name
TU102
-
GPU Variant
TU102-875-A1
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
12 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
18.6 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
754 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
CUDA
7.5
4.0
Shader Model
6.8
