NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA GRID M3 3020
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1536MB VRAM Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition and 4GB VRAM GRID M3 3020 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GRID M3 3020 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1306MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1536GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (83.20GB/s vs 76.80GB/s)
448 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition
0.462 TFLOPS
GRID M3 3020
+261%
1.672 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2008
Release Date
May 2016
Quadro FX
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1033 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1306 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1300 MHz
Memory
1536MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
76.80GB/s
Bandwidth
83.20GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
24
SM Count
-
192
Shading Units
640
64
TMUs
40
24
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
192 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
14.45 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.90 GPixel/s
38.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
52.24 GTexel/s
-
-
-
462.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.672 TFLOPS
57.79 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
52.24 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
Unknown
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GT200B
GPU Name
GM107
-
-
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
148 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
CUDA
5.0
4.0
Shader Model
6.7 (5.1)
