NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA GRID K340
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1536MB VRAM Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition and 1024MB VRAM GRID K340 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition 's Advantages
More VRAM (1536GB vs 1024GB)
Lower TDP (150W vs 225W)
NVIDIA GRID K340 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 8 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (80.00GB/s vs 76.80GB/s)
192 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition
0.462 TFLOPS
GRID K340
+58%
0.733 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2008
Release Date
Jul 2013
Quadro FX
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
1536MB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
76.80GB/s
Bandwidth
80.00GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
24
SM Count
-
192
Shading Units
384
64
TMUs
32
24
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
192 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
14.45 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.632 GPixel/s
38.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
30.53 GTexel/s
-
-
-
462.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
732.7 GFLOPS
57.79 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
30.53 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
225W
450 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GT200B
GPU Name
GK107
-
-
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
1.3
CUDA
3.0
4.0
Shader Model
5.1
