Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 4700 X2 vs NVIDIA RTX A500 Embedded

NVIDIA Quadro FX 4700 X2 vs NVIDIA RTX A500 Embedded

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 4700 X2 and 4GB VRAM RTX A500 Embedded to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A500 Embedded 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1335MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
1920 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (20W vs 226W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 4700 X2
0.384 TFLOPS
RTX A500 Embedded +1323%
5.468 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Apr 2008
Release Date
Mar 2022
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro Ampere-M
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
435 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1335 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
51.20GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
16
SM Count
16
128
Shading Units
2048
64
TMUs
64
16
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
64
-
RT Cores
16
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

9.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
42.72 GPixel/s
38.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
85.44 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.468 TFLOPS
384.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.468 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
85.44 GFLOPS

Board Design

226W
TDP
20W
550 W
Suggested PSU
-
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

G92
GPU Name
GA107S
G92-880-A2
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
65 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
8.7 billion
324 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
8.6
4.0
Shader Model
6.7
© 2025 - TopCPU.net