Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 4700 X2 vs Intel Arctic Sound M

NVIDIA Quadro FX 4700 X2 vs Intel Arctic Sound M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 4700 X2 and 16GB VRAM Intel Arctic Sound M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 4700 X2 's Advantages
Lower TDP (226W vs 500W)
Intel Arctic Sound M 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 9 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
8064 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 4700 X2
0.384 TFLOPS
Intel Arctic Sound M +3741%
14.75 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2008
Release Date
Jan 2022
Quadro FX
Generation
Xe Graphics
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM2e
256bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
51.20GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s

Render Config

16
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
128
Shading Units
8192
64
TMUs
256
16
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
64 KB
L2 Cache
8 MB

Theoretical Performance

9.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
115.2 GPixel/s
38.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
230.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
29.49 TFLOPS
384.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.75 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
3.686 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

G92
GPU Name
DG2-512
G92-880-A2
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
21.7 billion
324 mm²
Die Size
406 mm²

Board Design

226W
TDP
500W
550 W
Suggested PSU
900 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy