NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600 vs NVIDIA Tesla C2090
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 768MB VRAM Quadro FX 4600 and 6GB VRAM Tesla C2090 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (134W vs 250W)
NVIDIA Tesla C2090 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 4 months late
More VRAM (6GB vs 768GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (177.4GB/s vs 67.20GB/s)
416 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 4600
0.23 TFLOPS
Tesla C2090
+479%
1.332 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2007
Release Date
Jul 2011
Quadro FX
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
700 MHz
Memory Clock
924 MHz
Memory
768MB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
384bit
67.20GB/s
Bandwidth
177.4GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
12
SM Count
16
96
Shading Units
512
24
TMUs
64
24
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
96 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
12.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.83 GPixel/s
24.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.66 GTexel/s
-
-
-
230.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1332 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
666.1 GFLOPS
Board Design
134W
TDP
250W
300 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
G80
GPU Name
GF110
G80-850-A2
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
90 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.681 billion
Transistors
3 billion
484 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1 (1.0)
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.0
CUDA
2.0
4.0
Shader Model
5.1
