NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600 vs NVIDIA Quadro K6000
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 768MB VRAM Quadro FX 4600 and 12GB VRAM Quadro K6000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (134W vs 225W)
NVIDIA Quadro K6000 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock902MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 768GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.4GB/s vs 67.20GB/s)
2784 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 4600
0.23 TFLOPS
Quadro K6000
+2159%
5.196 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2007
Release Date
Jul 2013
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
797 MHz
-
Boost Clock
902 MHz
700 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz
Memory
768MB
Memory Size
12GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
384bit
67.20GB/s
Bandwidth
288.4GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
12
SM Count
-
96
Shading Units
2880
24
TMUs
240
24
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
96 KB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
12.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
54.12 GPixel/s
24.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
216.5 GTexel/s
-
-
-
230.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.196 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
1.732 TFLOPS
Board Design
134W
TDP
225W
300 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
G80
GPU Name
GK110B
G80-850-A2
GPU Variant
GK110-890-B1
Tesla
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
90 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.681 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
484 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1 (1.0)
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
1.0
CUDA
3.5
4.0
Shader Model
5.1
