NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 768MB VRAM Quadro FX 4600 and 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 360M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600 's Advantages
More VRAM (768GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (67.20GB/s vs 9.600GB/s)
80 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (17W vs 134W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 4600
+784%
0.23 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 360M
0.026 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2007
Release Date
May 2007
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
700 MHz
Memory Clock
600 MHz
Memory
768MB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
DDR2
384bit
Memory Bus
64bit
67.20GB/s
Bandwidth
9.600GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
12
SM Count
2
96
Shading Units
16
24
TMUs
8
24
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
96 KB
L2 Cache
16 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
12.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.600 GPixel/s
24.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.200 GTexel/s
-
-
-
230.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
25.60 GFLOPS
-
-
-
Board Design
134W
TDP
17W
300 W
Suggested PSU
-
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
G80
GPU Name
G86
G80-850-A2
GPU Variant
NB8M-GLM
Tesla
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
90 nm
Process Size
80 nm
0.681 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
484 mm²
Die Size
127 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1 (1.0)
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.0
CUDA
1.1
4.0
Shader Model
4.0
