NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600 vs Intel Data Center GPU Max 1550
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 768MB VRAM Quadro FX 4600 and 128GB VRAM Data Center GPU Max 1550 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (134W vs 600W)
Intel Data Center GPU Max 1550 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1600MHz
More VRAM (128GB vs 768GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3277GB/s vs 67.20GB/s)
16288 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 4600
0.23 TFLOPS
Data Center GPU Max 1550
+22695%
52.43 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2007
Release Date
Jan 2023
Quadro FX
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1600 MHz
700 MHz
Memory Clock
1600 MHz
Memory
768MB
Memory Size
128GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM2e
384bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
67.20GB/s
Bandwidth
3277GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
12
SM Count
-
96
Shading Units
16384
24
TMUs
1024
24
ROPs
0
-
Tensor Cores
1024
-
RT Cores
128
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per EU)
96 KB
L2 Cache
408 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
12.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
24.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1638 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
52.43 TFLOPS
230.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
52.43 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
52.43 TFLOPS
Board Design
134W
TDP
600W
300 W
Suggested PSU
1000 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
G80
GPU Name
Ponte Vecchio
G80-850-A2
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Generation 12.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
90 nm
Process Size
10 nm
0.681 billion
Transistors
100 billion
484 mm²
Die Size
1280 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1 (1.0)
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.0
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.6
