Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 380M vs NVIDIA RTX A500 Embedded

NVIDIA Quadro FX 380M vs NVIDIA RTX A500 Embedded

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 380M and 4GB VRAM RTX A500 Embedded to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A500 Embedded 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1335MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 12.64GB/s)
2032 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (20W vs 25W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 380M
0.047 TFLOPS
RTX A500 Embedded +11534%
5.468 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Jan 2010
Release Date
Mar 2022
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
Quadro Ampere-M
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
435 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1335 MHz
790 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
12.64GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
2
SM Count
16
16
Shading Units
2048
8
TMUs
64
4
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
64
-
RT Cores
16
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.424 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
42.72 GPixel/s
4.848 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
85.44 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.468 TFLOPS
46.98 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.468 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
85.44 GFLOPS

Board Design

25W
TDP
20W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GT218
GPU Name
GA107S
N10M-GLM
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
40 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
8.7 billion
57 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.2
CUDA
8.6
4.1
Shader Model
6.7
© 2025 - TopCPU.net