NVIDIA Quadro FX 380M vs NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Mobile GDDR6
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 380M and 4GB VRAM Quadro T1000 Mobile GDDR6 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro FX 380M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 50W)
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Mobile GDDR6 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1650MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 12.64GB/s)
880 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 380M
0.047 TFLOPS
Quadro T1000 Mobile GDDR6
+6191%
2.957 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2010
Release Date
Jun 2020
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1395 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1650 MHz
790 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
12.64GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
2
SM Count
14
16
Shading Units
896
8
TMUs
56
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.424 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
52.80 GPixel/s
4.848 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
92.40 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.914 TFLOPS
46.98 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.957 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
92.40 GFLOPS
Board Design
25W
TDP
50W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GT218
GPU Name
TU117B
N10M-GLM
GPU Variant
N19P-Q1-A1
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
57 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.2
CUDA
7.5
4.1
Shader Model
6.6
