NVIDIA Quadro FX 380M vs NVIDIA Quadro K5200
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 380M and 8GB VRAM Quadro K5200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro FX 380M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 150W)
NVIDIA Quadro K5200 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock771MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 12.64GB/s)
2288 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 380M
0.047 TFLOPS
Quadro K5200
+7459%
3.553 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2010
Release Date
Jul 2014
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
667 MHz
-
Boost Clock
771 MHz
790 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
12.64GB/s
Bandwidth
192.3GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
2
SM Count
-
16
Shading Units
2304
8
TMUs
192
4
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
32 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.424 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
37.01 GPixel/s
4.848 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
148.0 GTexel/s
-
-
-
46.98 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.553 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
148.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
25W
TDP
150W
-
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
-
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GT218
GPU Name
GK110B
N10M-GLM
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
57 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
1.2
CUDA
3.5
4.1
Shader Model
5.1
