NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800 vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 3800 and 8GB VRAM RTX A2000 Embedded to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded 's Advantages
Boost Clock1612MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
2368 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (60W vs 108W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 3800
0.462 TFLOPS
RTX A2000 Embedded
+1686%
8.253 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2009
Release Date
Unknown
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1117 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1612 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
51.20GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
24
SM Count
20
192
Shading Units
2560
64
TMUs
80
16
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
80
-
RT Cores
20
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
128 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
9.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
77.38 GPixel/s
38.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
129.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
8.253 TFLOPS
462.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.253 TFLOPS
57.79 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
129.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
108W
TDP
60W
300 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GT200B
GPU Name
GA107S
G200-835-B2
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
55 nm
Process Size
8 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
Unknown
470 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
CUDA
8.6
4.0
Shader Model
6.6
