NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI25
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 380 and 16GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI25 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 's Advantages
Lower TDP (34W vs 300W)
AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1500MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (436.2GB/s vs 22.40GB/s)
4080 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 380
0.035 TFLOPS
Radeon Instinct MI25
+35014%
12.29 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2009
Release Date
Jun 2017
Quadro FX
Generation
Radeon Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1400 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1500 MHz
700 MHz
Memory Clock
852 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM2
128bit
Memory Bus
2048bit
22.40GB/s
Bandwidth
436.2GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
64
2
SM Count
-
16
Shading Units
4096
8
TMUs
256
8
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
32 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
3.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
96.00 GPixel/s
3.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
384.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
24.58 TFLOPS
35.20 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.29 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
768.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
34W
TDP
300W
200 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
2x DVI
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
G96
GPU Name
Vega 10
-
GPU Variant
Vega 10 XT GL
(215-0894124)
Tesla
Architecture
GCN 5.0
UMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
65 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.314 billion
Transistors
12.5 billion
144 mm²
Die Size
495 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.4
