NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M vs NVIDIA Tesla C2050
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 360M and 3GB VRAM Tesla C2050 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (17W vs 238W)
NVIDIA Tesla C2050 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (3GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (144.0GB/s vs 9.600GB/s)
432 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 360M
0.026 TFLOPS
Tesla C2050
+3853%
1.028 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
May 2007
Release Date
Jul 2011
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
600 MHz
Memory Clock
750 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
3GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
384bit
9.600GB/s
Bandwidth
144.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
2
SM Count
14
16
Shading Units
448
8
TMUs
56
4
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
16 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
1.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.07 GPixel/s
3.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.14 GTexel/s
-
-
-
25.60 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1028 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
513.9 GFLOPS
Board Design
17W
TDP
238W
-
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
-
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
G86
GPU Name
GF100
NB8M-GLM
GPU Variant
GF100-850-A3
Tesla
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
3.1 billion
127 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.1
CUDA
2.0
4.0
Shader Model
5.1
