NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M vs NVIDIA Quadro K5000 SYNC
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 360M and 4GB VRAM Quadro K5000 SYNC to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (17W vs 122W)
NVIDIA Quadro K5000 SYNC 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 8 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (172.8GB/s vs 9.600GB/s)
1520 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 360M
0.026 TFLOPS
Quadro K5000 SYNC
+8242%
2.169 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
May 2007
Release Date
Jan 2013
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
600 MHz
Memory Clock
1350 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
9.600GB/s
Bandwidth
172.8GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
2
SM Count
-
16
Shading Units
1536
8
TMUs
128
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
16 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
1.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
22.59 GPixel/s
3.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
90.37 GTexel/s
-
-
-
25.60 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.169 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
90.37 GFLOPS
Board Design
17W
TDP
122W
-
Suggested PSU
300 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
1x SDI
-
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
G86
GPU Name
GK104
NB8M-GLM
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
127 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
1.1
CUDA
3.0
4.0
Shader Model
5.1
