Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M vs NVIDIA Quadro 410

NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M vs NVIDIA Quadro 410

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 360M and 512MB VRAM Quadro 410 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (17W vs 38W)
NVIDIA Quadro 410 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 3 months late
More VRAM (512GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (14.26GB/s vs 9.600GB/s)
176 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 360M
0.026 TFLOPS
Quadro 410 +942%
0.271 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

May 2007
Release Date
Aug 2012
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
600 MHz
Memory Clock
891 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
512MB
DDR2
Memory Type
DDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
9.600GB/s
Bandwidth
14.26GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
2
SM Count
-
16
Shading Units
192
8
TMUs
16
4
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
16 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

1.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.824 GPixel/s
3.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
11.30 GTexel/s
-
-
-
25.60 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
271.1 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
11.30 GFLOPS

Board Design

17W
TDP
38W
-
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.2
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

G86
GPU Name
GK107
NB8M-GLM
GPU Variant
GK107-810-A2
Tesla
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
127 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
1.1
CUDA
3.0
4.0
Shader Model
5.1
© 2025 - TopCPU.net