NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M vs NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 2
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 360M and 2GB VRAM GRID RTX T10 2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (17W vs 150W)
NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 2 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1395MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (672.0GB/s vs 9.600GB/s)
3568 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 360M
0.026 TFLOPS
GRID RTX T10 2
+38357%
9.999 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
May 2007
Release Date
Jan 2020
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1065 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1395 MHz
600 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
384bit
9.600GB/s
Bandwidth
672.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
2
SM Count
56
16
Shading Units
3584
8
TMUs
224
4
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
448
-
RT Cores
56
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
16 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
1.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
89.28 GPixel/s
3.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
312.5 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
20.00 TFLOPS
25.60 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
9.999 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
312.5 GFLOPS
Board Design
17W
TDP
150W
-
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
G86
GPU Name
TU102
NB8M-GLM
GPU Variant
TU102-875-A1
Tesla
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
18.6 billion
127 mm²
Die Size
754 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
7.5
4.0
Shader Model
6.8
