NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M vs NVIDIA GRID M60 2Q
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 360M and 2GB VRAM GRID M60 2Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (17W vs 225W)
NVIDIA GRID M60 2Q 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1178MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.4GB/s vs 9.600GB/s)
2032 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 360M
0.026 TFLOPS
GRID M60 2Q
+18457%
4.825 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
May 2007
Release Date
Aug 2015
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
557 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1178 MHz
600 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
9.600GB/s
Bandwidth
160.4GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
2
SM Count
-
16
Shading Units
2048
8
TMUs
128
4
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
16 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
1.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
75.39 GPixel/s
3.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
150.8 GTexel/s
-
-
-
25.60 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.825 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
150.8 GFLOPS
Board Design
17W
TDP
225W
-
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
G86
GPU Name
GM204
NB8M-GLM
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
5.2 billion
127 mm²
Die Size
398 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
5.2
4.0
Shader Model
6.4
