NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M vs NVIDIA A10M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 360M and 24GB VRAM A10M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (17W vs 150W)
NVIDIA A10M 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1635MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (600.2GB/s vs 9.600GB/s)
7152 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 360M
0.026 TFLOPS
A10M
+90053%
23.44 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
May 2007
Release Date
Feb 2022
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
Tesla Ampere
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
975 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1635 MHz
600 MHz
Memory Clock
1563 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
24GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
384bit
9.600GB/s
Bandwidth
600.2GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
2
SM Count
56
16
Shading Units
7168
8
TMUs
224
4
ROPs
80
-
Tensor Cores
224
-
RT Cores
56
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
16 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
1.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
130.8 GPixel/s
3.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
366.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
23.44 TFLOPS
25.60 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
23.44 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
732.5 GFLOPS
Board Design
17W
TDP
150W
-
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS
Graphics Processor
G86
GPU Name
GA102
NB8M-GLM
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
80 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
28.3 billion
127 mm²
Die Size
628 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
8.6
4.0
Shader Model
6.7
