NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M vs NVIDIA Tesla K20c
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 3600M and 5GB VRAM Tesla K20c to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (70W vs 225W)
NVIDIA Tesla K20c 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 9 months late
More VRAM (5GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (208.0GB/s vs 51.14GB/s)
2432 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 3600M
0.16 TFLOPS
Tesla K20c
+2102%
3.524 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2008
Release Date
Nov 2012
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-HE
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
799 MHz
Memory Clock
1300 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
5GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
320bit
51.14GB/s
Bandwidth
208.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
8
SM Count
-
64
Shading Units
2496
32
TMUs
208
16
ROPs
40
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
64 KB
L2 Cache
1280 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
8.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
36.71 GPixel/s
16.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
146.8 GTexel/s
-
-
-
160.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.524 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
1175 GFLOPS
Board Design
70W
TDP
225W
-
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
G92
GPU Name
GK110
NB8E-GLM3
GPU Variant
GK110-885-KA-A1
Tesla
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
324 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
1.1
CUDA
3.5
4.0
Shader Model
5.1
