NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M vs NVIDIA GRID M40
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 3600M and 8GB VRAM GRID M40 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GRID M40 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 3 months late
More VRAM (8GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (83.20GB/s vs 51.14GB/s)
320 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 70W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 3600M
0.16 TFLOPS
GRID M40
+395%
0.793 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2008
Release Date
May 2016
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-HE
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
799 MHz
Memory Clock
1300 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
51.14GB/s
Bandwidth
83.20GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
8
SM Count
-
64
Shading Units
384
32
TMUs
32
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
8.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.53 GPixel/s
16.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
33.06 GTexel/s
-
-
-
160.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
793.3 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
24.79 GFLOPS
Board Design
70W
TDP
50W
-
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-
Graphics Processor
G92
GPU Name
GM107
NB8E-GLM3
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
324 mm²
Die Size
148 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
5.0
4.0
Shader Model
5.1
