NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M vs NVIDIA GRID K340
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 3600M and 1024MB VRAM GRID K340 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (70W vs 225W)
NVIDIA GRID K340 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 5 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (80.00GB/s vs 51.14GB/s)
320 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 3600M
0.16 TFLOPS
GRID K340
+358%
0.733 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2008
Release Date
Jul 2013
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-HE
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
799 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
51.14GB/s
Bandwidth
80.00GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
8
SM Count
-
64
Shading Units
384
32
TMUs
32
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
64 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
8.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.632 GPixel/s
16.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
30.53 GTexel/s
-
-
-
160.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
732.7 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
30.53 GFLOPS
Board Design
70W
TDP
225W
-
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
G92
GPU Name
GK107
NB8E-GLM3
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
324 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
1.1
CUDA
3.0
4.0
Shader Model
5.1
