NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M vs Intel Data Center GPU Flex 140
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 3600M and 6GB VRAM Data Center GPU Flex 140 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (70W vs 75W)
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 140 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1950MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (186.0GB/s vs 51.14GB/s)
960 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 3600M
0.16 TFLOPS
Data Center GPU Flex 140
+2396%
3.994 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2008
Release Date
Aug 2022
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-HE
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1600 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1950 MHz
799 MHz
Memory Clock
1937 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
96bit
51.14GB/s
Bandwidth
186.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
8
SM Count
-
64
Shading Units
1024
32
TMUs
64
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
8
-
-
-
64 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
8.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
62.40 GPixel/s
16.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
124.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
7.987 TFLOPS
160.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.994 TFLOPS
-
-
-
Board Design
70W
TDP
75W
-
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 2.0
-
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
G92
GPU Name
DG2-128
NB8E-GLM3
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
Tesla
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
324 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.6
