NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800 vs NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Mobile GDDR6
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 768MB VRAM Quadro FX 1800 and 4GB VRAM Quadro T1000 Mobile GDDR6 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Mobile GDDR6 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1650MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 768GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 38.40GB/s)
832 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 59W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 1800
0.176 TFLOPS
Quadro T1000 Mobile GDDR6
+1580%
2.957 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2009
Release Date
Jun 2020
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1395 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1650 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
768MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
192bit
Memory Bus
128bit
38.40GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
8
SM Count
14
64
Shading Units
896
32
TMUs
56
12
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
48 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
6.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
52.80 GPixel/s
17.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
92.40 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.914 TFLOPS
176.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.957 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
92.40 GFLOPS
Board Design
59W
TDP
50W
250 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
G94
GPU Name
TU117B
G94 GL-U
GPU Variant
N19P-Q1-A1
Tesla
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.505 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
240 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
7.5
4.0
Shader Model
6.6
