NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 vs NVIDIA RTX A1000 Embedded
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1700 and 4GB VRAM RTX A1000 Embedded to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 's Advantages
Lower TDP (42W vs 60W)
NVIDIA RTX A1000 Embedded 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1627MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
2016 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 1700
0.059 TFLOPS
RTX A1000 Embedded
+11194%
6.664 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Sep 2007
Release Date
Jan 2022
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1192 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1627 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
224.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
4
SM Count
16
32
Shading Units
2048
16
TMUs
64
8
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
64
-
RT Cores
16
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
3.680 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
78.10 GPixel/s
7.360 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
104.1 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
6.664 TFLOPS
58.88 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
6.664 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
104.1 GFLOPS
Board Design
42W
TDP
60W
200 W
Suggested PSU
-
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
G84
GPU Name
GA107S
G84-875-A2
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
80 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.289 billion
Transistors
Unknown
169 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
8.6
4.0
Shader Model
6.6
