NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA RTX A4500 Max-Q
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition and 16GB VRAM RTX A4500 Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (42W vs 80W)
NVIDIA RTX A4500 Max-Q 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1215MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 20.80GB/s)
5856 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition
0.067 TFLOPS
RTX A4500 Max Q
+21258%
14.31 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Sep 2008
Release Date
Mar 2022
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro Ampere-M
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
510 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1215 MHz
650 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
20.80GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
4
SM Count
46
32
Shading Units
5888
16
TMUs
184
8
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
184
-
RT Cores
46
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
4.160 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
116.6 GPixel/s
8.320 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
223.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
14.31 TFLOPS
66.56 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.31 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
223.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
42W
TDP
80W
200 W
Suggested PSU
-
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
G84
GPU Name
GA104
-
-
-
Tesla
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
80 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.289 billion
Transistors
17.4 billion
169 mm²
Die Size
392 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
8.6
4.0
Shader Model
6.7
