NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition and 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (42W vs 55W)
NVIDIA Quadro M2000M 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1098MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (80.19GB/s vs 20.80GB/s)
608 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition
0.067 TFLOPS
Quadro M2000M
+1997%
1.405 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Sep 2008
Release Date
Dec 2015
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1029 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1098 MHz
650 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
20.80GB/s
Bandwidth
80.19GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
4
SM Count
-
32
Shading Units
640
16
TMUs
40
8
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
4.160 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.57 GPixel/s
8.320 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
43.92 GTexel/s
-
-
-
66.56 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1405 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
43.92 GFLOPS
Board Design
42W
TDP
55W
200 W
Suggested PSU
-
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
G84
GPU Name
GM107
-
GPU Variant
N16P-Q3-A2
Tesla
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.289 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
169 mm²
Die Size
148 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
5.0
4.0
Shader Model
5.1
