NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA Quadro CX
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition and 1536MB VRAM Quadro CX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (42W vs 150W)
NVIDIA Quadro CX 's Advantages
More VRAM (1536GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (76.80GB/s vs 20.80GB/s)
160 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition
0.067 TFLOPS
Quadro CX
+589%
0.462 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Sep 2008
Release Date
Nov 2008
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro CX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
650 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
1536MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
20.80GB/s
Bandwidth
76.80GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
4
SM Count
24
32
Shading Units
192
16
TMUs
64
8
ROPs
24
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
32 KB
L2 Cache
192 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
4.160 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.45 GPixel/s
8.320 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
38.53 GTexel/s
-
-
-
66.56 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
462.3 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
57.79 GFLOPS
Board Design
42W
TDP
150W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort
1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
G84
GPU Name
GT200B
-
-
-
Tesla
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.289 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
169 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.1
CUDA
1.3
4.0
Shader Model
4.0
