NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition vs Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition and 128GB VRAM Data Center GPU Max Subsystem to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (42W vs 2400W)
Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1600MHz
More VRAM (128GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3205GB/s vs 20.80GB/s)
16352 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition
0.067 TFLOPS
Data Center GPU Max Subsystem
+78153%
52.43 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Sep 2008
Release Date
Jan 2023
Quadro FX
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1600 MHz
650 MHz
Memory Clock
1565 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
128GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM2e
128bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
20.80GB/s
Bandwidth
3205GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
4
SM Count
-
32
Shading Units
16384
16
TMUs
1024
8
ROPs
0
-
Tensor Cores
1024
-
RT Cores
128
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per EU)
32 KB
L2 Cache
408 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
4.160 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
8.320 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1638 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
52.43 TFLOPS
66.56 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
52.43 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
52.43 TFLOPS
Board Design
42W
TDP
2400W
200 W
Suggested PSU
2800 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin
Graphics Processor
G84
GPU Name
Ponte Vecchio
-
-
-
Tesla
Architecture
Generation 12.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
80 nm
Process Size
10 nm
0.289 billion
Transistors
100 billion
169 mm²
Die Size
1280 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.6
