NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M vs NVIDIA Tesla T10 Processor
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1600M and 4GB VRAM Tesla T10 Processor to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 188W)
NVIDIA Tesla T10 Processor 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 10 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (102.4GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
208 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 1600M
0.08 TFLOPS
Tesla T10 Processor
+677%
0.622 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2007
Release Date
Apr 2009
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-HE
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
512bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
102.4GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
4
SM Count
30
32
Shading Units
240
16
TMUs
80
8
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
32 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
5.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.52 GPixel/s
10.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
48.80 GTexel/s
-
-
-
80.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
622.1 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
77.76 GFLOPS
Board Design
50W
TDP
188W
-
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-
Graphics Processor
G84
GPU Name
GT200B
NB8P-GLM
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.289 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
169 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.1
CUDA
1.3
4.0
Shader Model
4.0
