NVIDIA Quadro CX vs NVIDIA RTX A6000
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1536MB VRAM Quadro CX and 48GB VRAM RTX A6000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro CX 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 300W)
NVIDIA RTX A6000 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1800MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 1536GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (768.0GB/s vs 76.80GB/s)
10560 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro CX
0.462 TFLOPS
RTX A6000
+8278%
38.71 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2008
Release Date
Oct 2020
Quadro CX
Generation
Quadro Ampere
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1410 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1800 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
1536MB
Memory Size
48GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
384bit
76.80GB/s
Bandwidth
768.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
24
SM Count
84
192
Shading Units
10752
64
TMUs
336
24
ROPs
112
-
Tensor Cores
336
-
RT Cores
84
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
192 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
14.45 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
201.6 GPixel/s
38.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
604.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
38.71 TFLOPS
462.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
38.71 TFLOPS
57.79 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
604.8 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
300W
450 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort
1x S-Video
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS
Graphics Processor
GT200B
GPU Name
GA102
-
-
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
55 nm
Process Size
8 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
28.3 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
628 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
CUDA
8.6
4.0
Shader Model
6.7
