NVIDIA Quadro CX vs NVIDIA Quadro K5000 SYNC
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1536MB VRAM Quadro CX and 4GB VRAM Quadro K5000 SYNC to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro K5000 SYNC 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 1536GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (172.8GB/s vs 76.80GB/s)
1344 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (122W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro CX
0.462 TFLOPS
Quadro K5000 SYNC
+369%
2.169 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2008
Release Date
Jan 2013
Quadro CX
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1350 MHz
Memory
1536MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
76.80GB/s
Bandwidth
172.8GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
24
SM Count
-
192
Shading Units
1536
64
TMUs
128
24
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
192 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
14.45 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
22.59 GPixel/s
38.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
90.37 GTexel/s
-
-
-
462.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.169 TFLOPS
57.79 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
90.37 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
122W
450 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort
1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
1x SDI
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GT200B
GPU Name
GK104
-
-
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
1.3
CUDA
3.0
4.0
Shader Model
5.1
