NVIDIA Quadro CX vs NVIDIA Quadro K3100M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1536MB VRAM Quadro CX and 4GB VRAM Quadro K3100M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro K3100M 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 8 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 1536GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (102.4GB/s vs 76.80GB/s)
576 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro CX
0.462 TFLOPS
Quadro K3100M
+134%
1.084 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2008
Release Date
Jul 2013
Quadro CX
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
1536MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
76.80GB/s
Bandwidth
102.4GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
24
SM Count
-
192
Shading Units
768
64
TMUs
64
24
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
192 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
14.45 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.30 GPixel/s
38.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
45.18 GTexel/s
-
-
-
462.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1084 GFLOPS
57.79 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
45.18 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
75W
450 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort
1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GT200B
GPU Name
GK104
-
GPU Variant
N15E-Q1-A2
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
1.3
CUDA
3.0
4.0
Shader Model
5.1
