NVIDIA Quadro CX vs NVIDIA Quadro 2000D
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1536MB VRAM Quadro CX and 1024MB VRAM Quadro 2000D to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro CX 's Advantages
More VRAM (1536GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (76.80GB/s vs 41.60GB/s)
NVIDIA Quadro 2000D 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 11 months late
Lower TDP (62W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro CX
0.462 TFLOPS
Quadro 2000D
+3%
0.48 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2008
Release Date
Oct 2011
Quadro CX
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
650 MHz
Memory
1536MB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
76.80GB/s
Bandwidth
41.60GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
24
SM Count
4
192
Shading Units
192
64
TMUs
32
24
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
192 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
14.45 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.000 GPixel/s
38.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
20.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
462.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
480.0 GFLOPS
57.79 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
40.00 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
62W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort
1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GT200B
GPU Name
GF106
-
GPU Variant
GF106-875-KA-A1
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
40 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
1.17 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
238 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.3
CUDA
2.1
4.0
Shader Model
5.1
