NVIDIA Quadro CX vs NVIDIA GRID M60 4A
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1536MB VRAM Quadro CX and 4GB VRAM GRID M60 4A to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro CX 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 225W)
NVIDIA GRID M60 4A 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1178MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1536GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.4GB/s vs 76.80GB/s)
1856 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro CX
0.462 TFLOPS
GRID M60 4A
+944%
4.825 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2008
Release Date
Aug 2015
Quadro CX
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
557 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1178 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz
Memory
1536MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
76.80GB/s
Bandwidth
160.4GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
24
SM Count
-
192
Shading Units
2048
64
TMUs
128
24
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
192 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
14.45 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
75.39 GPixel/s
38.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
150.8 GTexel/s
-
-
-
462.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.825 TFLOPS
57.79 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
150.8 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
225W
450 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort
1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GT200B
GPU Name
GM204
-
-
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
5.2 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
398 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
CUDA
5.2
4.0
Shader Model
6.4
