NVIDIA Quadro CX vs NVIDIA GRID M10 8Q
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1536MB VRAM Quadro CX and 8GB VRAM GRID M10 8Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro CX 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 225W)
NVIDIA GRID M10 8Q 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1306MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1536GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (83.20GB/s vs 76.80GB/s)
448 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro CX
0.462 TFLOPS
GRID M10 8Q
+261%
1.672 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2008
Release Date
May 2016
Quadro CX
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1033 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1306 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1300 MHz
Memory
1536MB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
76.80GB/s
Bandwidth
83.20GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
24
SM Count
-
192
Shading Units
640
64
TMUs
40
24
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
192 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
14.45 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.90 GPixel/s
38.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
52.24 GTexel/s
-
-
-
462.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.672 TFLOPS
57.79 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
52.24 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
225W
450 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort
1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GT200B
GPU Name
GM107
-
GPU Variant
GM107-570-A2
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
148 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
CUDA
5.0
4.0
Shader Model
5.1
