NVIDIA Quadro CX vs Intel Arctic Sound-M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1536MB VRAM Quadro CX and 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro CX 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 500W)
Intel Arctic Sound-M 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 1536GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 76.80GB/s)
8000 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro CX
0.462 TFLOPS
Arctic Sound M
+3092%
14.75 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2008
Release Date
Jan 2022
Quadro CX
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz
Memory
1536MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM2e
384bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
76.80GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
24
SM Count
-
192
Shading Units
8192
64
TMUs
256
24
ROPs
128
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
192 KB
L2 Cache
8 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
14.45 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
115.2 GPixel/s
38.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
230.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
29.49 TFLOPS
462.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.75 TFLOPS
57.79 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
3.686 TFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
500W
450 W
Suggested PSU
900 W
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort
1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS
Graphics Processor
GT200B
GPU Name
Arctic Sound
-
-
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Generation 12.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
55 nm
Process Size
10 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
8 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
190 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.6
