NVIDIA Quadro 7000 vs NVIDIA Quadro K5200
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Quadro 7000 and 8GB VRAM Quadro K5200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro K5200 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock771MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 163.4GB/s)
1792 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (150W vs 204W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro 7000
1.332 TFLOPS
Quadro K5200
+166%
3.553 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
May 2012
Release Date
Jul 2014
Quadro
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
667 MHz
-
Boost Clock
771 MHz
851 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
163.4GB/s
Bandwidth
192.3GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
14
SM Count
-
512
Shading Units
2304
64
TMUs
192
48
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
768 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
18.23 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
37.01 GPixel/s
41.66 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
148.0 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1332 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.553 TFLOPS
666.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
148.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
204W
TDP
150W
550 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort
1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
-
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GF110
GPU Name
GK110B
-
-
-
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
2.0
CUDA
3.5
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
