NVIDIA Quadro 6000 SDI vs NVIDIA Tesla C2050
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Quadro 6000 SDI and 3GB VRAM Tesla C2050 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro 6000 SDI 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 3GB)
Lower TDP (231W vs 238W)
NVIDIA Tesla C2050 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (144.0GB/s vs 143.4GB/s)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro 6000 SDI
1.028 TFLOPS
Tesla C2050
1.028 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2011
Release Date
Jul 2011
Quadro
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
747 MHz
Memory Clock
750 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
384bit
143.4GB/s
Bandwidth
144.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
14
SM Count
14
448
Shading Units
448
56
TMUs
56
48
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
16.07 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.07 GPixel/s
32.14 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.14 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1028 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1028 GFLOPS
513.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
513.9 GFLOPS
Board Design
231W
TDP
238W
550 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort
1x S-Video
2x SDI
Outputs
1x DVI
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GF100
GPU Name
GF100
-
GPU Variant
GF100-850-A3
Fermi
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
40 nm
3.1 billion
Transistors
3.1 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.0
CUDA
2.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
