NVIDIA Quadro 5010M vs NVIDIA Tesla C2090
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro 5010M and 6GB VRAM Tesla C2090 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro 5010M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (100W vs 250W)
NVIDIA Tesla C2090 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (177.4GB/s vs 83.20GB/s)
128 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro 5010M
0.691 TFLOPS
Tesla C2090
+92%
1.332 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2011
Release Date
Jul 2011
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
650 MHz
Memory Clock
924 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
83.20GB/s
Bandwidth
177.4GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
12
SM Count
16
384
Shading Units
512
48
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
10.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.83 GPixel/s
21.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.66 GTexel/s
-
-
-
691.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1332 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
666.1 GFLOPS
Board Design
100W
TDP
250W
-
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-
Graphics Processor
GF110
GPU Name
GF110
N12E-Q5
GPU Variant
-
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
40 nm
3 billion
Transistors
3 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.0
CUDA
2.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
