NVIDIA Quadro 5010M vs NVIDIA Tesla C2050
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro 5010M and 3GB VRAM Tesla C2050 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro 5010M 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 3GB)
Lower TDP (100W vs 238W)
NVIDIA Tesla C2050 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (144.0GB/s vs 83.20GB/s)
64 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro 5010M
0.691 TFLOPS
Tesla C2050
+48%
1.028 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2011
Release Date
Jul 2011
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
650 MHz
Memory Clock
750 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
83.20GB/s
Bandwidth
144.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
12
SM Count
14
384
Shading Units
448
48
TMUs
56
32
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
10.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.07 GPixel/s
21.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.14 GTexel/s
-
-
-
691.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1028 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
513.9 GFLOPS
Board Design
100W
TDP
238W
-
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
-
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GF110
GPU Name
GF100
N12E-Q5
GPU Variant
GF100-850-A3
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
40 nm
3 billion
Transistors
3.1 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.0
CUDA
2.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
