NVIDIA Quadro 5010M vs NVIDIA GRID K240Q
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro 5010M and 1024MB VRAM GRID K240Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro 5010M 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Lower TDP (100W vs 225W)
NVIDIA GRID K240Q 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 4 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 83.20GB/s)
1152 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro 5010M
0.691 TFLOPS
GRID K240Q
+231%
2.289 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2011
Release Date
Jun 2013
Quadro Mobile
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
650 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
83.20GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
12
SM Count
-
384
Shading Units
1536
48
TMUs
128
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
512 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
10.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.84 GPixel/s
21.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
95.36 GTexel/s
-
-
-
691.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.289 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
95.36 GFLOPS
Board Design
100W
TDP
225W
-
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-
Graphics Processor
GF110
GPU Name
GK104
N12E-Q5
GPU Variant
-
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
2.0
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
