Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro 5010M vs NVIDIA GRID A100B

NVIDIA Quadro 5010M vs NVIDIA GRID A100B

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro 5010M and 48GB VRAM GRID A100B to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro 5010M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (100W vs 400W)
NVIDIA GRID A100B 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1005MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1866GB/s vs 83.20GB/s)
6528 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro 5010M
0.691 TFLOPS
GRID A100B +1910%
13.89 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Feb 2011
Release Date
May 2020
Quadro Mobile
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1005 MHz
650 MHz
Memory Clock
1215 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
48GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
256bit
Memory Bus
6144bit
83.20GB/s
Bandwidth
1866GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
12
SM Count
108
384
Shading Units
6912
48
TMUs
432
32
ROPs
192
-
Tensor Cores
432
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
192 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
48 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

10.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
193.0 GPixel/s
21.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
434.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
55.57 TFLOPS
691.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
13.89 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
6.947 TFLOPS

Board Design

100W
TDP
400W
-
Suggested PSU
800 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GF110
GPU Name
GA100
N12E-Q5
GPU Variant
-
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
7 nm
3 billion
Transistors
54.2 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
826 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.0
CUDA
8.0
5.1
Shader Model
N/A
© 2025 - TopCPU.net