NVIDIA Quadro 5000M vs NVIDIA GRID K260Q
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1792MB VRAM Quadro 5000M and 2GB VRAM GRID K260Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro 5000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (100W vs 225W)
NVIDIA GRID K260Q 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 11 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 1792GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 76.80GB/s)
1216 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro 5000M
0.518 TFLOPS
GRID K260Q
+341%
2.289 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2010
Release Date
Jun 2013
Quadro Mobile
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
600 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
1792MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
76.80GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
10
SM Count
-
320
Shading Units
1536
40
TMUs
128
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
512 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
8.100 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.84 GPixel/s
16.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
95.36 GTexel/s
-
-
-
518.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.289 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
95.36 GFLOPS
Board Design
100W
TDP
225W
-
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-
Graphics Processor
GF100
GPU Name
GK104
N10E-GLM5-A3
GPU Variant
-
Fermi
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3.1 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
2.0
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
