NVIDIA Quadro 5000 vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 0GB VRAM Quadro 5000 and 8GB VRAM RTX A2000 Embedded to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded 's Advantages
Boost Clock1612MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 120.0GB/s)
2208 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (60W vs 152W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro 5000
0.722 TFLOPS
RTX A2000 Embedded
+1043%
8.253 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2011
Release Date
Unknown
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1117 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1612 MHz
750 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
320bit
Memory Bus
128bit
120.0GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
11
SM Count
20
352
Shading Units
2560
44
TMUs
80
40
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
80
-
RT Cores
20
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
640 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
11.29 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
77.38 GPixel/s
22.57 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
129.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
8.253 TFLOPS
722.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.253 TFLOPS
361.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
129.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
152W
TDP
60W
450 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GF100
GPU Name
GA107S
GF100-850-A3
GPU Variant
-
Fermi
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
40 nm
Process Size
8 nm
3.1 billion
Transistors
Unknown
529 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.0
CUDA
8.6
5.1
Shader Model
6.6
