NVIDIA Quadro 5000 vs NVIDIA Quadro K5200
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 0GB VRAM Quadro 5000 and 8GB VRAM Quadro K5200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro K5200 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock771MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 120.0GB/s)
1952 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (150W vs 152W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro 5000
0.722 TFLOPS
Quadro K5200
+392%
3.553 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2011
Release Date
Jul 2014
Quadro
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
667 MHz
-
Boost Clock
771 MHz
750 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz
Memory
GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
320bit
Memory Bus
256bit
120.0GB/s
Bandwidth
192.3GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
11
SM Count
-
352
Shading Units
2304
44
TMUs
192
40
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
640 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
11.29 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
37.01 GPixel/s
22.57 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
148.0 GTexel/s
-
-
-
722.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.553 TFLOPS
361.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
148.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
152W
TDP
150W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort
Outputs
2x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GF100
GPU Name
GK110B
GF100-850-A3
GPU Variant
-
Fermi
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3.1 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
2.0
CUDA
3.5
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
