NVIDIA Quadro 5000 vs NVIDIA GRID K2
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 0GB VRAM Quadro 5000 and 4GB VRAM GRID K2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro 5000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (152W vs 225W)
NVIDIA GRID K2 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 3 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 120.0GB/s)
1184 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro 5000
0.722 TFLOPS
GRID K2
+217%
2.289 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2011
Release Date
May 2013
Quadro
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
750 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
320bit
Memory Bus
256bit
120.0GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
11
SM Count
-
352
Shading Units
1536
44
TMUs
128
40
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
640 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
11.29 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.84 GPixel/s
22.57 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
95.36 GTexel/s
-
-
-
722.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.289 TFLOPS
361.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
95.36 GFLOPS
Board Design
152W
TDP
225W
450 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GF100
GPU Name
GK104
GF100-850-A3
GPU Variant
GK104-895-A2
Fermi
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3.1 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2.175
2.0
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
6.5 (5.1)
