Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro 4100 vs NVIDIA RTX A2000

NVIDIA Quadro 4100 vs NVIDIA RTX A2000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro 4100 and 6GB VRAM RTX A2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro 4100 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 70W)
NVIDIA RTX A2000 's Advantages
Boost Clock1200MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 57.02GB/s)
1984 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro 4100
2.142 TFLOPS
RTX A2000 +272%
7.987 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Aug 2021
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Ampere
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
562 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1200 MHz
891 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
6GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
192bit
57.02GB/s
Bandwidth
288.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
26
-
Compute Units
-
1344
Shading Units
3328
112
TMUs
104
32
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
104
-
RT Cores
26
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
3 MB

Theoretical Performance

22.32 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
57.60 GPixel/s
89.26 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
124.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
7.987 TFLOPS
2.142 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.987 TFLOPS
89.26 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
124.8 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
GA106
-
GPU Variant
GA106-850-A1
Kepler
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
8 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
12 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
276 mm²

Board Design

35W
TDP
70W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
8.6
5.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy