NVIDIA Quadro 4100 vs NVIDIA GRID K2
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro 4100 and 4GB VRAM GRID K2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro 4100 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 225W)
NVIDIA GRID K2 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 57.02GB/s)
192 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro 4100
2.142 TFLOPS
GRID K2
+6%
2.289 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
May 2013
Quadro
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
891 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
57.02GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
1344
Shading Units
1536
112
TMUs
128
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
512 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
22.32 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.84 GPixel/s
89.26 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
95.36 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.142 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.289 TFLOPS
89.26 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
95.36 GFLOPS
Board Design
35W
TDP
225W
200 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GK104
GPU Name
GK104
-
GPU Variant
GK104-895-A2
Kepler
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.2.175
3.0
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
6.5 (5.1)
